Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a puter. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
声称历史文物和艺术作品都可以从电脑上看到，因此公共博物馆和艺术画廊便不再需要了简直就是荒唐。
It is simply absurd to assert that with historical objects and works of art being able to be seen through a puter, public museums and art galleries will no longer be needed.
首先，电脑永远替代不了真正的公共博物馆和艺术画廊。不管电脑影像何等真实、形象，它们仍然仅仅是影像而已，不是我们真正看到的、甚或还会被容许用指端触摸一下的历史文物和艺术作品。对于那些声称因为可以从电脑屏幕上看到想看的一切，所以博物馆和艺术画廊没有继续存在必要的人们，我想建议他们就从电脑里娶个太太或者嫁个丈夫得了，犯不着去娶嫁真实生活中的人! First of all, puters can never replace real public museums and art galleries. No matter how real and vivid puter images are, they are only images, not the historical objects and works of art that we see in real or even might be allowed to touch with our fingertips. For those who claim museums and galleries are no longer needed because they can see all they want to on a puter screen, Id like to
suggest that they marry a wife or husband in the puter rather than in real life!
因篇幅问题不能全部显示，请点此查看更多更全内容